Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Good Rv Equipment Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Good Rv Equipment Inc. is currently handling 3 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, meaning every pending matter is being reviewed by a different person in a different administrative unit. This represents a high level of diversification for a portfolio with 3 pending office actions. Such a spread suggests that the company's technology touches on several different technical sub-fields.

CHRISTOPHER W RAIMUND is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner is responsible for a portion of the 3 pending office actions, with the other actions assigned to the remaining 3 distinct examiners. No single examiner holds a majority of the company's active workload, which distributes the risk across multiple individuals. This structure requires the company to maintain multiple lines of communication with the USPTO.

The involvement of 3 distinct art units suggests that the company's technology is being examined under different sets of technical guidelines. With 3 distinct examiners, the company must manage separate prosecution styles and timelines. Addressing the 3 pending office actions will require a unique approach for each examiner, including CHRISTOPHER W RAIMUND. Practitioners must be diligent in tracking the specific requirements of all 3 distinct art units to ensure overall portfolio success.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CONDO, VERONICA MARIE 1 82.0% +6.9%
RAIMUND, CHRISTOPHER W 1 72.4% +24.0%
CIGNA, JACOB JAMES 1 63.8% +32.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18483001 SYSTEMS AND APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING MULTIPLE LARGE-SIZED SANDWICH PANELS CIGNA, JACOB JAMES 46d overdue
18482968 INTER-CONTAINER COVER SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHODS CONDO, VERONICA MARIE 6d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18483001 SYSTEMS AND APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING MULTIPLE LARGE-SIZED SANDWICH PANELS CIGNA, JACOB JAMES 46d overdue
18483012 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING LARGE-SIZED SANDWICH PANEL RAIMUND, CHRISTOPHER W —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3612 1
1746 1
3726 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18482968 INTER-CONTAINER COVER SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHODS CONDO, VERONICA MARIE 3612 §102§103 Non-Final OA 6d Pending Oct 09, 2023
18483012 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING LARGE-SIZED SANDWICH PANEL RAIMUND, CHRISTOPHER W 1746 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 09, 2023
18483001 SYSTEMS AND APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING MULTIPLE LARGE-SIZED SANDWICH PANELS CIGNA, JACOB JAMES 3726 §102§103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Oct 09, 2023

Managing Good Rv Equipment Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month