Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Gopath Laboratories LLC holds a company patent portfolio that currently includes 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE. The data indicates 0 distinct art units for this portfolio, which suggests that the pending matter is not currently categorized within a standard art unit in this record. This lack of departmental assignment is a notable feature of the current prosecution status.
GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE is the busiest examiner for the portfolio and is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending action, the prosecution is entirely centralized. The 0 distinct art units mean that the practitioner must rely on the examiner's specific feedback without the context of a defined art unit's typical practices. This 1 to 1 ratio between the busiest examiner's workload and the total actions confirms a singular focus.
The outcome of the 1 pending office action will determine the immediate progress of the company's intellectual property. Because there are 0 distinct art units, the administrative path of the application is unique. Practitioners should focus on the 1 distinct examiner to resolve the current pending matter, as there are no other active cases or examiners involved.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE | 1 | 45.8% | +40.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18685129 | METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR PREDICTING THE PROGRESSION OF PROSTATE CANCER AND TREATING SAME | GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18685129 | METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR PREDICTING THE PROGRESSION OF PROSTATE CANCER AND TREATING SAME | GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18685129 | METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR PREDICTING THE PROGRESSION OF PROSTATE CANCER AND TREATING SAME | GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE | — | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 20, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial