Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Grafton Schools Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Grafton Schools Inc. maintains a portfolio with 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution shows that the company's current patent applications are being reviewed by multiple officials in different administrative divisions of the office. The lack of concentration suggests that the company's innovations in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering are being categorized into separate technical specialties.

BODENDORF, ANDREW is the busiest examiner for this entity, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. While the portfolio is small, the presence of 2 distinct examiners for only 2 pending actions suggests that each application is receiving independent review. Practitioners should prepare for varied examination styles across the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector, as the 2 distinct art units may apply different procedural standards to the pending matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BODENDORF, ANDREW 2 29.5% +37.6%
ANDERSON, MEGAN M 1 74.9% +27.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18667829 METHOD FOR UTILIZING A BLOCKING PAD BODENDORF, ANDREW 49d overdue
17876965 BLOCKING PAD AND A METHOD OF USE THEREOF BODENDORF, ANDREW 16d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18667829 METHOD FOR UTILIZING A BLOCKING PAD BODENDORF, ANDREW 49d overdue
18667757 BLOCKING PAD AND METHOD FOR PREVENTING INJURY TO A USER FROM A SPECIAL INDIVIDUAL ANDERSON, MEGAN M 14d
17876965 BLOCKING PAD AND A METHOD OF USE THEREOF BODENDORF, ANDREW 16d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3715 2
3784 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18667829 METHOD FOR UTILIZING A BLOCKING PAD BODENDORF, ANDREW 3715 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 49d overdue Pending May 17, 2024
18667757 BLOCKING PAD AND METHOD FOR PREVENTING INJURY TO A USER FROM A SPECIAL INDIVIDUAL ANDERSON, MEGAN M 3784 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending May 17, 2024
17876965 BLOCKING PAD AND A METHOD OF USE THEREOF BODENDORF, ANDREW 3715 §101§102§103§112Other Final Rejection 16d Pending Jul 29, 2022

Managing Grafton Schools Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month