Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Gratuity LLC currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific focus within the mechanical and systems domain. The prosecution involves a single distinct examiner, WILDER, ANDREW H, who is the busiest examiner for the company. This single examiner is responsible for the entirety of the company's active docket.
With a single pending office action and a single examiner, the prosecution profile is highly concentrated. WILDER, ANDREW H is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's filings within the technical art unit. This means the active matter represents the only current point of contact with the patent office for Gratuity LLC in this technology area. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of this active case as it defines the company's current patent strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WILDER, ANDREW H | 1 | 62.6% | +58.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18894815 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING GRATUITIES | WILDER, ANDREW H | 28d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18894815 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING GRATUITIES | WILDER, ANDREW H | 28d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3627 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18894815 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING GRATUITIES | WILDER, ANDREW H | 3627 | §101 | Final Rejection | 28d overdue | Pending | Sep 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial