Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Grc Technologies LLC maintains a prosecution profile with 1 pending office action. This activity is situated in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating the scope of current patent office interaction. This structure means there are no competing examiner priorities or differing art unit standards to navigate simultaneously. The focus on 1 technology area reflects the current intellectual property strategy.
BRAD HARCOURT serves as the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is handling 1 pending office action, which accounts for all current activity in the portfolio. This focus allows for a targeted approach to addressing the pending requirements of the patent office. Since 1 distinct examiner is responsible for the 1 active case, the prosecution strategy is dependent on the dialogue with BRAD HARCOURT. Practitioners can dedicate their attention to the technical concerns raised in this 1 action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector to advance the company's intellectual property goals. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit ensures that the examination follows a set of procedural guidelines.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HARCOURT, BRAD | 1 | 84.2% | +5.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18665716 | SUBMERSIBLE PUMP GAUGE WITH DOWNHOLE ANALYSIS CAPABILITY | HARCOURT, BRAD | 49d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3674 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18665716 | SUBMERSIBLE PUMP GAUGE WITH DOWNHOLE ANALYSIS CAPABILITY | HARCOURT, BRAD | 3674 | §103 | Final Rejection | 49d | Pending | May 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial