Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Green Bell Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This case is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a highly focused prosecution strategy. The concentration in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering reflects the company's primary technical field for current filings.
The busiest examiner for this company is NOBREGA, TATIANA L, who is overseeing the 1 pending office action. With the busiest examiner pending count at 1, the workload is entirely concentrated under this individual's review. This singular point of contact provides a direct path for the company to manage its active case through the patent office.
Practitioners should note that the outcome of the current patent effort depends on the interaction with NOBREGA, TATIANA L. With 1 pending office action, the portfolio is not currently undergoing broad expansion. The coordination of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit simplifies the administrative requirements for tracking this Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering application.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOBREGA, TATIANA L | 1 | 33.3% | +58.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18813584 | NAIL FILE | NOBREGA, TATIANA L | 37d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18813584 | NAIL FILE | NOBREGA, TATIANA L | 37d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3799 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18813584 | NAIL FILE | NOBREGA, TATIANA L | 3799 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 37d overdue | Pending | Aug 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial