Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Greenbul Engineering Eood has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct art unit, reflecting a focused effort within a specific branch of chemical engineering. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner indicates that the company's current interaction with the patent office is limited to a single point of contact. This centralization allows for a highly efficient prosecution process where all feedback is channeled through one individual.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is GRAHAM, ANDREW D, who is responsible for the pending office action. This single action constitutes the entirety of the company's current pending workload at the patent office. Consequently, the progress of the portfolio is currently dependent on the specific examination style and requirements of GRAHAM, ANDREW D within the designated art unit. Practitioners should focus on addressing the specific technical concerns raised by this examiner to move the application toward allowance.
With only 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy is highly concentrated. Practitioners can focus their resources on addressing the specific concerns raised in the distinct art unit without the distraction of competing deadlines or differing examiner opinions. This concentration allows for a precise and targeted response to the current Chemistry & Materials filing. Success in this matter will be the primary indicator of the company's current patenting progress, making the dialogue with GRAHAM, ANDREW D the most critical element of their intellectual property strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRAHAM, ANDREW D | 1 | 59.8% | +23.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18281370 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SHAPED BODY FROM PLASTIC WASTE AND NATURAL FIBRES | GRAHAM, ANDREW D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1742 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18281370 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SHAPED BODY FROM PLASTIC WASTE AND NATURAL FIBRES | GRAHAM, ANDREW D | 1742 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialGreenbul Engineering Eood has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Andrew D Graham has the most, with 1 of Greenbul Engineering Eood's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
