Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Greenlifetech Corporation

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Greenlifetech Corporation is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution activity is limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner for the company is NGUYEN, VY T, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently on record.

The concentration of the portfolio into 1 distinct art unit suggests a specific technical focus within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. Because only 1 distinct examiner is involved, the company's current patent strategy is highly dependent on the individual review of NGUYEN, VY T. This examiner's handling of the active action will determine the immediate progress of the company's intellectual property in this area.

Practitioners overseeing this portfolio face a centralized prosecution environment. With 1 pending office action, there are no competing priorities or differing examiner styles to manage at this time. The focus remains entirely on the active case within the designated art unit to secure patent rights for Greenlifetech Corporation.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, VY T 1 71.8% +35.5%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18095961 OXYGEN REMOVAL TECHNIQUE FOR A FLEXIBLE BAG IN A FOOD PRESERVATION SYSTEM NGUYEN, VY T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3761 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18095961 OXYGEN REMOVAL TECHNIQUE FOR A FLEXIBLE BAG IN A FOOD PRESERVATION SYSTEM NGUYEN, VY T 3761 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 11, 2023

Managing Greenlifetech Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month