Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Grignard Pure LLC currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct art unit, indicating a very specific technical focus for the company's current USPTO activity. The concentration in a specialized division suggests that the company's chemical innovations are being evaluated within a narrow technical scope, which may lead to a highly focused examination process.
The prosecution is handled by a distinct examiner, TALBERT, ERIC MICHAEL. This official is the busiest for the portfolio with 1 pending action. This concentrated review process means the company's immediate patent outcome depends entirely on the feedback and interpretation of this specific examiner. Having a single official responsible for the entire active workload allows the legal team to focus exclusively on the preferences and procedural expectations of that individual.
While this centralized structure provides a clear point of contact, it also means the company's current prosecution success is tied to the perspective of the assigned reviewer. Practitioners should prioritize building a thorough understanding of the technical requirements and examination style favored by TALBERT, ERIC MICHAEL. The outcome of the active matter will be a significant indicator of the company's future trajectory within the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TALBERT, ERIC MICHAEL | 1 | 22.2% | +55.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19112039 | Sanitizing Methods | TALBERT, ERIC MICHAEL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19112039 | Sanitizing Methods | TALBERT, ERIC MICHAEL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1758 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19112039 | Sanitizing Methods | TALBERT, ERIC MICHAEL | 1758 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 14, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialGrignard Pure LLC has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Eric Michael Talbert has the most, with 1 of Grignard Pure LLC's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
