Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Group Up Industrial Co. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ. Because there is only 1 distinct art unit involved in the portfolio, the prosecution strategy appears concentrated within a specific technical niche of the patent office. This lack of diversity in art units suggests that the company's current intellectual property efforts are focused on a narrow set of chemical or material innovations that fall under a single administrative umbrella.
The busiest examiner for the company is GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This individual handles the current workload before the office. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the firm faces no variability in examiner behavior or procedural standards across its pending cases. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the specific requirements and historical tendencies of this individual examiner rather than managing diverse procedural styles. This concentration allows for a more tailored and potentially efficient response strategy to the pending matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ | 1 | 68.8% | +44.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19049111 | VACUUM LAMINATION METHOD | GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19049111 | VACUUM LAMINATION METHOD | GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1748 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19049111 | VACUUM LAMINATION METHOD | GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ | 1748 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 10, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial