Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Gs Licenseco LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. This represents a focused point of contact with 1 examiner within the patent office. Such a profile means that the company's current prosecution success is tied to a single technical and administrative path. The focus on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area highlights the company's specific technological interests.
ANDREW J TRIGGS is the busiest examiner for the company, handling 1 pending office action. This 1 action accounts for the entirety of the company's current prosecution activity. Practitioners can focus their resources on this specific examiner interaction to move the application toward a final resolution. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the strategy can be tailored specifically to the feedback and history of ANDREW J TRIGGS. This focus is relevant given the 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area, where specific examiner interpretations impact the scope of the resulting patent. The 1 distinct art unit provides a procedural framework for this prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 1 | 66.7% | +27.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18665977 | SELF-STORAGE FACILITY, FABRICATION, AND METHODOLOGY | TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 6d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18665977 | SELF-STORAGE FACILITY, FABRICATION, AND METHODOLOGY | TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 3635 | §103 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | May 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial