Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Gts France has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, WAMBST, DAVID ALEXANDER, who is also the busiest examiner for the company. The portfolio is currently limited to 1 distinct art unit, which implies a specific technical focus within the broader communications field. With 1 pending office action, the company is navigating the examination process for its latest innovation.
Because WAMBST, DAVID ALEXANDER is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending action, the prosecution effort is entirely concentrated. This lack of diversification means the outcome of the 1 pending office action relies on the specific feedback of a single examiner. However, the presence of only 1 distinct art unit means that the prosecution team only needs to adapt to the procedural nuances of one departmental group. This allows for a highly targeted approach to resolving the 1 pending office action while ensuring technical compliance with the standards of the assigned art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAMBST, DAVID ALEXANDER | 1 | 70.0% | +46.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18772121 | Data processing method onboard a machine using database storing definition data of landmark objects along a predetermined path of the machine, associated data processing device and computer program | WAMBST, DAVID ALEXANDER | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2663 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18772121 | Data processing method onboard a machine using database storing definition data of landmark objects along a predetermined path of the machine, associated data processing device and computer program | WAMBST, DAVID ALEXANDER | 2663 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialGts France has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
David Alexander Wambst has the most, with 1 of Gts France's pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
