Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This single action represents the company's entire active prosecution workload within this technical field. The activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, which points to a very specific technical focus for the company's current patent applications in this sector.
The prosecution is managed by 1 distinct examiner, PARK, HYUN D, who is currently overseeing 1 pending office action. As the only examiner involved, PARK, HYUN D handles all of the company's pending matters in this area. The concentration of 1 pending office action within 1 distinct art unit and under 1 examiner means that the company's immediate patenting success depends on a single point of review. Practitioners should tailor their approach to the specific requirements of this examiner, as there is no current diversification of examiners or art units for the 1 pending action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PARK, HYUN D | 1 | 41.7% | +22.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17912195 | A LITHIUM BATTERY POWER DISPLAY METHOD AND SYSTEM | PARK, HYUN D | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17912195 | A LITHIUM BATTERY POWER DISPLAY METHOD AND SYSTEM | PARK, HYUN D | 13d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2857 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17912195 | A LITHIUM BATTERY POWER DISPLAY METHOD AND SYSTEM | PARK, HYUN D | 2857 | §101 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Sep 16, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial