Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Guangzhou Haichuan Technology Development Co. Ltd. is managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The current prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the company's immediate intellectual property focus is on a specific mechanical or system-based invention.
The busiest examiner for the company is GARFT, CHRISTOPHER, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. For the practitioner, this means that the success of the current prosecution cycle depends entirely on the negotiation with this 1 examiner. There are no other pending matters to provide alternative opportunities for allowance, making this 1 office action the central point of the company's current patent strategy. The organization must focus its resources on satisfying the 1 distinct art unit's standards via GARFT, CHRISTOPHER.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GARFT, CHRISTOPHER | 1 | 59.0% | +23.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18978093 | FOLDING SUPPORTING BRACKET | GARFT, CHRISTOPHER | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18978093 | FOLDING SUPPORTING BRACKET | GARFT, CHRISTOPHER | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3632 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18978093 | FOLDING SUPPORTING BRACKET | GARFT, CHRISTOPHER | 3632 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial