Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Guangzhou Landian Trading Co. Ltd. currently faces 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. HAWKINS, JASON KHALIL is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 pending office action.
The presence of only 1 pending office action suggests a very targeted intellectual property strategy at the USPTO. Because the portfolio involves only 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution risk is concentrated rather than diversified across multiple personnel. Similarly, the use of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the company's current filings are confined to a specific technical niche. Practitioners should prioritize a thorough review of the prior art cited by HAWKINS, JASON KHALIL, as this single examiner's perspective is currently the sole factor in the company's prosecution progress. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action means there is no opportunity to observe varying examiner temperaments across multiple cases. This concentrated profile requires a precise and well-prepared response to the 1 pending office action, as there are no other applications to offset a potential rejection.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAWKINS, JASON KHALIL | 1 | 68.0% | +43.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18772787 | KNIFE GRINDING ASSEMBLY AND KNIFE GRINDING APPARATUS | HAWKINS, JASON KHALIL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18772787 | KNIFE GRINDING ASSEMBLY AND KNIFE GRINDING APPARATUS | HAWKINS, JASON KHALIL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3723 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18772787 | KNIFE GRINDING ASSEMBLY AND KNIFE GRINDING APPARATUS | HAWKINS, JASON KHALIL | 3723 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialGuangzhou Landian Trading Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jason Khalil Hawkins has the most, with 1 of Guangzhou Landian Trading Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
