Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Guangzhou T K Medical Instrument Co. Ltd. holds a company patent portfolio with 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. No technology area is specified for this portfolio in the provided data, which may reflect a specialized or emerging field of innovation for the company. Having 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner means the company's immediate patenting goals are concentrated on the outcome of 1 pending matter.
The data indicates 0 distinct art units for the current pending activity. JACOB, OOMMEN is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With only 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the current prosecution is entirely focused on the review of 1 individual. This means the company's immediate patenting success relies on the specific examination style of this 1 examiner. The presence of 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action suggests a direct line of communication with the patent office. Because the data reports 0 distinct art units, the prosecution of this 1 pending office action by the 1 distinct examiner represents the entirety of the company's current active patent office engagement, requiring a targeted approach to address the examiner's specific requirements.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JACOB, OOMMEN | 1 | 79.1% | +17.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18739169 | MEDICAL OPTICAL TRACKING SYSTEM | JACOB, OOMMEN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18739169 | MEDICAL OPTICAL TRACKING SYSTEM | JACOB, OOMMEN | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18739169 | MEDICAL OPTICAL TRACKING SYSTEM | JACOB, OOMMEN | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial