1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Guangzhou Yijia Electronic Co. Ltd. maintains a company patent portfolio that currently features 1 pending office actions. This single matter indicates a very focused current prosecution effort. The portfolio involves 1 distinct examiners. This means the immediate future of the company's patenting activity is tied to the review of a single individual. The prosecution strategy for Guangzhou Yijia Electronic Co. Ltd. is currently entirely dependent on the interactions with this single examiner.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is WEILAND, HANS R.. This examiner is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because there is only 1 pending office actions in total, WEILAND, HANS R. is managing the entire active workload for the company. The data reports 0 distinct art units, which may reflect a specific administrative or procedural status for this case. Practitioners should focus their efforts on the specific requirements of WEILAND, HANS R. to advance the portfolio. The absence of multiple art units simplifies the coordination of the current prosecution effort.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEILAND, HANS R. | 1 | 55.7% | +13.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19013387 | HEAT DISSIPATION LIQUID COOLING SINK | WEILAND, HANS R. | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19013387 | HEAT DISSIPATION LIQUID COOLING SINK | WEILAND, HANS R. | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19013387 | HEAT DISSIPATION LIQUID COOLING SINK | WEILAND, HANS R. | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 08, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial