Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Gulli Concept is currently navigating 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit, indicating a very focused prosecution profile. The practitioner can concentrate their efforts on the specific technical and legal issues relevant to this single pending matter.
The busiest examiner is JONES, JAMES WILLIAM, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the feedback from this one individual. This allows the practitioner to develop a deep understanding of the examiner's specific preferences and the typical practices of the 1 distinct art unit.
In the field of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems, having 1 pending office action means the company's current interaction with the USPTO is limited to a single point of contact. The practitioner should prioritize a clear and persuasive response to JONES, JAMES WILLIAM to move this 1 pending office action toward allowance. There are no other pending actions to manage or coordinate at this time.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JONES, JAMES WILLIAM | 1 | 73.9% | +20.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18711207 | SAFETY AND COMFORT PULLEY FOR ZIPLINE | JONES, JAMES WILLIAM | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18711207 | SAFETY AND COMFORT PULLEY FOR ZIPLINE | JONES, JAMES WILLIAM | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18711207 | SAFETY AND COMFORT PULLEY FOR ZIPLINE | JONES, JAMES WILLIAM | 3615 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialGulli Concept has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
James William Jones has the most, with 1 of Gulli Concept's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
