Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Gurit (Uk) Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a concentrated prosecution profile for its current filings. The portfolio is also limited to 1 distinct art unit, which suggests that the company's current innovations fall under a specific technical classification. This structure simplifies the prosecution process by focusing on the requirements of a single art unit. Such a focused approach allows the company to dedicate its resources to a single active matter.
The busiest examiner for Gurit (Uk) Ltd. is PIZIALI, ANDREW T, who is managing the 1 busiest examiner pending action. As the only examiner currently reviewing the company's work, PIZIALI, ANDREW T holds the entire active workload. For the applicant, this means that the success of the current prosecution depends on the specific interpretations and standards of this individual. The presence of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit highlights a focused strategy for patent acquisition in the Chemistry & Materials sector. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of PIZIALI, ANDREW T.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIZIALI, ANDREW T | 1 | 28.3% | +27.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18559372 | Composite Material Layer and Manufacture of Sandwich Panels | PIZIALI, ANDREW T | 36d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18559372 | Composite Material Layer and Manufacture of Sandwich Panels | PIZIALI, ANDREW T | 36d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1789 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18559372 | Composite Material Layer and Manufacture of Sandwich Panels | PIZIALI, ANDREW T | 1789 | §103 | Final Rejection | 36d overdue | Pending | Nov 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial