Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
H W J Designs For Agribusiness Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. The narrow scope of this activity reflects a concentrated prosecution effort for the company's current patent applications, with no current activity distributed across other technical groups.
The busiest examiner, GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ, is responsible for the 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner involved in the portfolio, the company's immediate patent outcomes are tied to the review of this individual. This creates a prosecution environment where the company's strategy must be closely aligned with the specific interpretations and requirements of GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ.
With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's current filings are subject to a single set of administrative and technical standards. This centralization simplifies the prosecution process but also limits the company's exposure to different examiner perspectives. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific tendencies of both the art unit and the individual examiner to effectively manage the pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ | 1 | 68.8% | +44.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18830750 | STRAP WELDING SYSTEM AND METHOD | GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1748 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18830750 | STRAP WELDING SYSTEM AND METHOD | GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ | 1748 | §103DP | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Sep 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial