Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Hagane Pty Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution of the company's patent applications is focused, involving 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a singular focus for the company's current efforts to secure patent rights. Such concentration allows for a more predictable interaction with the patent office, as the company only needs to navigate the specific technical interpretations of 1 distinct art unit.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is GLESSNER, BRIAN E, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This single action represents the total of 1 pending office action for the company. All current feedback from the patent office is channeled through this 1 busiest examiner pending office action and the single associated art unit. The concentration of the workload under 1 distinct examiner allows for a more direct dialogue during prosecution, potentially simplifying the process of reaching an agreement on claim scope within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLESSNER, BRIAN E | 1 | 35.7% | +26.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16972234 | CONNECTING DEVICE AND FORMWORK ASSEMBLY FOR CONNECTING ASSEMBLIES OF PANELS | GLESSNER, BRIAN E | 49d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3633 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16972234 | CONNECTING DEVICE AND FORMWORK ASSEMBLY FOR CONNECTING ASSEMBLIES OF PANELS | GLESSNER, BRIAN E | 3633 | §103 | Final Rejection | 49d | Pending | Dec 04, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial