Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Haiba LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is under the review of 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the company's current prosecution efforts. A single-examiner focus often allows for a more direct and consistent dialogue during the application process.
The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit. HENRY, THOMAS HAYNES is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This 1 busiest examiner pending action represents the entirety of the company's current active matters before the patent office. The prosecution's progress is therefore dependent on the specific feedback and requirements of this 1 art unit and the assigned examiner. Practitioners should carefully review the examiner's history with similar mechanical engineering claims to optimize the response to the 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HENRY, THOMAS HAYNES | 1 | 51.8% | +35.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18241627 | INTERACTIVE DYNAMIC NARRATIVE PRODUCTION AND PLAYBACK | HENRY, THOMAS HAYNES | 56d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18241627 | INTERACTIVE DYNAMIC NARRATIVE PRODUCTION AND PLAYBACK | HENRY, THOMAS HAYNES | 56d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3715 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18241627 | INTERACTIVE DYNAMIC NARRATIVE PRODUCTION AND PLAYBACK | HENRY, THOMAS HAYNES | 3715 | §101§102 | Final Rejection | 56d | Pending | Sep 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial