Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Hall Labs LLC

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (40%)
2
Easy (40%)
1
Unknown (20%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
§112 only2 (40%)
No statute on record1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CRANE, LAUREN ASHLEY 1 57.2% +31.7%
FRICK, EMMA K 1 70.5% +20.0%
ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 1 71.8% +19.7%
MOMPER, ANNA M 1 61.9% +25.9%
PHILIPS, BRADLEY H 1 67.1% +30.6%

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17815189 Device Providing Filtered Air for a User PHILIPS, BRADLEY H 127d overdue
18454760 Winch with Supporting Member ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 112d overdue
18060539 HOISTING DEVICE WITH MULTIPLE LINE TYPES ON DRIVESHAFT MOMPER, ANNA M 91d overdue
18505676 Recirculating Shower System CRANE, LAUREN ASHLEY 24d overdue
18465963 Mobile Cart with Adjustable Cargo Container FRICK, EMMA K 82d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3754 1
3613 1
3654 1
3619 1
3799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18505676 Recirculating Shower System CRANE, LAUREN ASHLEY 3754 §112 Non-Final OA 24d overdue Pending Nov 09, 2023
18465963 Mobile Cart with Adjustable Cargo Container FRICK, EMMA K 3613 §103 Non-Final OA 82d Pending Sep 12, 2023
18454760 Winch with Supporting Member ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 3654 §103 Non-Final OA 112d overdue Pending Aug 23, 2023
18060539 HOISTING DEVICE WITH MULTIPLE LINE TYPES ON DRIVESHAFT MOMPER, ANNA M 3619 §112 Non-Final OA 91d overdue Pending Nov 30, 2022
17815189 Device Providing Filtered Air for a User PHILIPS, BRADLEY H 3799 Other Final Rejection 127d overdue Pending Jul 26, 2022

Managing Hall Labs LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month