1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Hameur currently has 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, KASZTEJNA, MATTHEW JOHN, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. The concentration of the entire pending portfolio under 1 distinct examiner suggests a singular point of contact for current prosecution efforts.
The portfolio is active within 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the technical scope of the pending application is highly focused. Because KASZTEJNA, MATTHEW JOHN manages the only 1 pending action, the success of the current portfolio rests entirely on the resolution of this examiner's requirements. This lack of examiner diversity means that the company cannot leverage different perspectives across multiple personnel.
With 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution strategy is streamlined but also carries higher risk. The fact that 1 pending office action is the only active matter means that any delay or rejection from KASZTEJNA, MATTHEW JOHN will impact the entire pending portfolio. Practitioners should focus on meeting the specific technical standards of this 1 distinct art unit to clear the current 1 pending action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KASZTEJNA, MATTHEW JOHN | 1 | 64.5% | +13.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18687823 | FOOD PREPARATION APPLIANCE, TOOL AND COVER OF SUCH AN APPLIANCE | KASZTEJNA, MATTHEW JOHN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18687823 | FOOD PREPARATION APPLIANCE, TOOL AND COVER OF SUCH AN APPLIANCE | KASZTEJNA, MATTHEW JOHN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3993 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18687823 | FOOD PREPARATION APPLIANCE, TOOL AND COVER OF SUCH AN APPLIANCE | KASZTEJNA, MATTHEW JOHN | 3993 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialHameur has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Matthew John Kasztejna has the most, with 1 of Hameur's pending office actions.
