Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BURLESON, MICHAEL L | 1 | 74.5% | -7.2% |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2681 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18567357 | METHOD FOR CALCULATING LENGTH OF CRACK LINE BY USING CONTINUOUSLY CAPTURED IMAGES OF CRACK LINE IN BUILDING SUBJECT TO SAFETY DIAGNOSIS, AND WORKER TERMINAL HAVING INSTALLED THEREON PROGRAM FOR EXECUTING METHOD FOR CALCULATING LENGTH OF CRACK LINE BY USING CONTINUOUSLY CAPTURED IMAGES OF CRACK LINE IN BUILDING SUBJECT TO SAFETY DIAGNOSIS | BURLESON, MICHAEL L | 2681 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 70d overdue | Pending | Jan 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial