Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Harada Electronics Industry Co. Ltd. has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These are spread across 3 distinct examiners and distinct art units. This distribution indicates that each of the pending office actions is being reviewed by a different examiner and within a different technical unit, requiring the applicant to manage separate prosecution tracks without any overlap.
ROZANSKI, MICHAEL T is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action. With 3 pending office actions and distinct examiners, the workload is decentralized, meaning that the prosecution of each application will be subject to the individual preferences and styles of different examiners. This lack of concentration requires a tailored approach for each matter currently pending at the USPTO.
The use of distinct art units for the pending office actions suggests that the company's technology is being evaluated across several specialized groups. This necessitates a broad understanding of different art unit cultures and policies. Practitioners should be prepared to navigate different examiner relationships and art unit environments to successfully manage the current pending workload in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROZANSKI, MICHAEL T | 1 | 69.1% | +29.0% |
| NASSER, ROBERT L | 1 | 73.0% | +11.2% |
| STEINBERG, AMANDA L | 1 | 51.7% | +26.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18730202 | MAGNETIC TREATMENT APPARATUS | ROZANSKI, MICHAEL T | — |
| 18728741 | MAGNETIC TREATMENT APPARATUS | NASSER, ROBERT L | — |
| 18350809 | ECG MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND ECG TRANSMITTER | STEINBERG, AMANDA L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3797 | 1 |
| 3992 | 1 |
| 3792 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18730202 | MAGNETIC TREATMENT APPARATUS | ROZANSKI, MICHAEL T | 3797 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 18, 2024 |
| 18728741 | MAGNETIC TREATMENT APPARATUS | NASSER, ROBERT L | 3992 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 12, 2024 |
| 18350809 | ECG MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND ECG TRANSMITTER | STEINBERG, AMANDA L | 3792 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialHarada Electronics Industry Co. Ltd. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.
Michael T Rozanski has the most, with 1 of Harada Electronics Industry Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
