Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Harbinger AS

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Harbinger AS has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is handled by a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. Brogan Rane Landeen is the busiest examiner for the company, managing the 1 pending office action. Prosecution for Harbinger AS is currently focused on this single examiner.

With 1 pending office action, the company's immediate prosecution workload is concentrated. The assignment to Brogan Rane Landeen in a distinct art unit means that the entire prosecution experience is shaped by this examiner's interpretation of the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field. This lack of examiner diversity means that the company does not have multiple points of feedback from the patent office. Harbinger AS must carefully manage its interaction with Brogan Rane Landeen to ensure a favorable outcome for the pending office action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LANDEEN, BROGAN RANE 1 28.6% -33.3%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18614022 TONGUE MUSCLE SPINDLE STIMULATOR LANDEEN, BROGAN RANE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18614022 TONGUE MUSCLE SPINDLE STIMULATOR LANDEEN, BROGAN RANE 3791 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 22, 2024

Managing Harbinger AS's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Harbinger AS have?

Harbinger AS has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Harbinger AS applications?

Brogan Rane Landeen has the most, with 1 of Harbinger AS's pending office actions.

What technology area are Harbinger AS's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month