Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Harex Infotech Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Harex Infotech Inc. manages 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions involve 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This indicates that the pending matters are being reviewed in a small number of technical divisions. With 3 pending office actions, the company's current prosecution is focused on a narrow range of technical subjects within the transportation and e-commerce sectors.

POND, ROBERT M is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 3 distinct examiners for 3 pending actions, each matter is currently being handled by a different individual. This distribution across 3 distinct examiners means that the outcome of each action is independent of the others. The focus within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area across only 2 art units suggests that while the examiners differ, the technical standards applied to the actions may be similar.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GEORGALAS, ANNE MARIE 1 43.0% +51.4%
POND, ROBERT M 1 71.1% +42.3%
PRINCE, JESSICA MARIE 1 77.3% +15.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18864724 USER-CENTRIC HYPER-PERSONALIZED PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION AND MARKETING SYSTEM AND METHOD POND, ROBERT M 70d
18864599 NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING-BASED PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM AND METHOD ENABLING PROVISION OF PRODUCT PLANNING INFORMATION GEORGALAS, ANNE MARIE —
18720789 LEARNING METHOD USING USER-CENTRIC AI PRINCE, JESSICA MARIE —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18864724 USER-CENTRIC HYPER-PERSONALIZED PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION AND MARKETING SYSTEM AND METHOD POND, ROBERT M 70d
18864599 NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING-BASED PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM AND METHOD ENABLING PROVISION OF PRODUCT PLANNING INFORMATION GEORGALAS, ANNE MARIE —
18720789 LEARNING METHOD USING USER-CENTRIC AI PRINCE, JESSICA MARIE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3689 1
3688 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18864599 NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING-BASED PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM AND METHOD ENABLING PROVISION OF PRODUCT PLANNING INFORMATION GEORGALAS, ANNE MARIE 3689 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2024
18864724 USER-CENTRIC HYPER-PERSONALIZED PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION AND MARKETING SYSTEM AND METHOD POND, ROBERT M 3688 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 70d Pending Nov 11, 2024
18720789 LEARNING METHOD USING USER-CENTRIC AI PRINCE, JESSICA MARIE — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2024

Managing Harex Infotech Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month