Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Harrison Bay Life Sciences LLC has 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. This pending matter is situated in 1 distinct art unit, showing a narrow departmental footprint for the current portfolio. The company interacts with 1 distinct examiner for its active prosecution, which limits the variety of examiner perspectives currently affecting the portfolio. This suggests that the company's current intellectual property strategy is focused on a specific technical application.
The busiest examiner, WU, TONY, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This single action represents the total volume of pending office actions for the company. With the entire pending workload handled by this individual, the prosecution strategy is currently focused on a single point of contact within the patent office. For the applicant, this means that the success of the current filing rests on addressing the specific concerns and examination patterns of WU, TONY.
Because the portfolio involves only the single art unit, there is no need to coordinate across different technical groups or reconcile conflicting departmental requirements. The current prosecution load is focused and manageable. This concentration allows for a targeted approach to the Computing & Software technology area, where the assigned examiner serves as the sole arbiter for the company's pending patent claims.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WU, TONY | 1 | 53.4% | +26.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2166 | 1 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial