Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Harrow Ip LLC

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Harrow Ip LLC currently manages 4 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These matters are assigned to distinct examiners, ensuring that the company's prosecution is not overly dependent on any single official. The actions are also spread across a matching number of distinct art units, which indicates a wide technical distribution for the company's active intellectual property.

IVAN A GREENE is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing 1 pending office action. Because the busiest examiner pending count is only a quarter of the 4 total pending office actions, the company must manage multiple separate lines of communication with the patent office. This one to one ratio between actions, examiners, and art units suggests that each application is being treated as a unique technical and procedural challenge. Practitioners should be prepared to adapt their arguments to the specific standards of the various art units and the preferences of the different examiners to advance the pharmaceutical portfolio effectively.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (50%)
§103 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GREENE, IVAN A 1 18.8% +6.1%
PACKARD, BENJAMIN J 1 66.9% +15.3%
KWON, YONG SOK 1 24.6% +42.7%
JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER LINDSAY 1 48.6% +78.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18844789 EXTENDED-RELEASE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING EYE CONDITIONS GREENE, IVAN A —
18390923 MIDAZOLAM AND KETAMINE FOR ENHANCED SEDATION KWON, YONG SOK —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18629882 TOPICAL OCULAR THERAPY PACKARD, BENJAMIN J 10d overdue
18390923 MIDAZOLAM AND KETAMINE FOR ENHANCED SEDATION KWON, YONG SOK —
18537780 CORNEAL THERAPY JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER LINDSAY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1619 1
1612 1
1613 1
1691 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18844789 EXTENDED-RELEASE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING EYE CONDITIONS GREENE, IVAN A 1619 §101§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18629882 TOPICAL OCULAR THERAPY PACKARD, BENJAMIN J 1612 §103 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Apr 08, 2024
18390923 MIDAZOLAM AND KETAMINE FOR ENHANCED SEDATION KWON, YONG SOK 1613 §101§102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2023
18537780 CORNEAL THERAPY JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER LINDSAY 1691 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2023

Managing Harrow Ip LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Harrow Ip LLC have?

Harrow Ip LLC has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Harrow Ip LLC applications?

Ivan A Greene has the most, with 1 of Harrow Ip LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Harrow Ip LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month