Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Harrow Ip LLC

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Harrow Ip LLC is currently managing 5 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are assigned to 5 distinct examiners, ensuring that each matter is reviewed by a different official. The portfolio's activity spans 3 distinct art units, indicating a range of technical focuses within their pharmaceutical filings. This distribution across 3 distinct art units requires the applicant to address different technical standards while resolving these 5 pending office actions. Practitioners should be prepared to manage the varying procedural norms of the 3 distinct art units involved.

The busiest examiner, GREENE, IVAN A, is responsible for 1 pending office action. With 5 distinct examiners for the 5 total pending actions, the company's workload is perfectly distributed among different officials. This arrangement provides 5 unique perspectives on the company's biotechnology claims across the 3 distinct art units. Practitioners should be prepared to manage 5 separate examiner interactions and the individual styles of each official. The 5 pending office actions represent a diverse and decentralized effort to protect the company's pharmaceutical intellectual property. This structure ensures that no single examiner's decision dominates the overall portfolio, allowing for independent evaluations of each biotechnology filing across the 3 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (33%)
4
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (33%)
§103 only1 (17%)
Double-patenting + other3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GREENE, IVAN A 1 18.7% +6.4%
RAO, SAVITHA M 1 60.7% +30.2%
PACKARD, BENJAMIN J 1 66.7% +15.6%
KWON, YONG SOK 1 24.6% +42.7%
JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER LINDSAY 1 46.9% +81.0%
BOATENG, AFUA BAMFOAA 1 46.6% +64.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18844789 EXTENDED-RELEASE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING EYE CONDITIONS GREENE, IVAN A —
18390923 MIDAZOLAM AND KETAMINE FOR ENHANCED SEDATION KWON, YONG SOK —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18629882 TOPICAL OCULAR THERAPY PACKARD, BENJAMIN J 10d overdue
18816461 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ANESTHESIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS RAO, SAVITHA M —
18390923 MIDAZOLAM AND KETAMINE FOR ENHANCED SEDATION KWON, YONG SOK —
18537780 CORNEAL THERAPY JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER LINDSAY —
18117126 OPHTHALMIC DYE COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR ADMINISTERING SAME BOATENG, AFUA BAMFOAA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1612 1
1613 1
1691 1
1617 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18844789 EXTENDED-RELEASE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING EYE CONDITIONS GREENE, IVAN A — §101§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18816461 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ANESTHESIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS RAO, SAVITHA M — §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 27, 2024
18629882 TOPICAL OCULAR THERAPY PACKARD, BENJAMIN J 1612 §103Other Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Apr 08, 2024
18390923 MIDAZOLAM AND KETAMINE FOR ENHANCED SEDATION KWON, YONG SOK 1613 §101§102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2023
18537780 CORNEAL THERAPY JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER LINDSAY 1691 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2023
18117126 OPHTHALMIC DYE COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR ADMINISTERING SAME BOATENG, AFUA BAMFOAA 1617 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Mar 03, 2023

Managing Harrow Ip LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month