Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Hayden AI Technologies Inc. currently has 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This specific action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution activity is limited to 1 distinct art unit, which defines the current scope of the company's interactions with the patent office.
The busiest examiner identified in the portfolio is AKHTER, SHARMIN. This individual is currently handling 1 pending office action. This single examiner manages the entire pending workload for the company at this time. The concentration of the portfolio in the Communications sector involves the 1 distinct art unit for all current matters.
With the current pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the company maintains an active presence in the examination phase. AKHTER, SHARMIN oversees the workload within the designated technology area. This distribution reflects the prosecution profile for the company's current applications and ensures that each matter is addressed.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM, MATTHEW DAVID | 1 | 74.1% | +14.2% |
| AKHTER, SHARMIN | 1 | 70.4% | +28.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19219636 | BEHIND THE WINDSHIELD CAMERA-BASED PERCEPTION FOR AUTONOMOUS TRAFFIC VIOLATION DETECTION | KIM, MATTHEW DAVID | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18941927 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING TRAFFIC RULES USING MULTIPLE MAPPING LAYERS WITH TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SEMANTICS | AKHTER, SHARMIN | 45d overdue |
| 19219636 | BEHIND THE WINDSHIELD CAMERA-BASED PERCEPTION FOR AUTONOMOUS TRAFFIC VIOLATION DETECTION | KIM, MATTHEW DAVID | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2483 | 1 |
| 2689 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19219636 | BEHIND THE WINDSHIELD CAMERA-BASED PERCEPTION FOR AUTONOMOUS TRAFFIC VIOLATION DETECTION | KIM, MATTHEW DAVID | 2483 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 27, 2025 |
| 18941927 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING TRAFFIC RULES USING MULTIPLE MAPPING LAYERS WITH TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SEMANTICS | AKHTER, SHARMIN | 2689 | §103 | Final Rejection | 45d overdue | Pending | Nov 08, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial