Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Healthy Io Ltd. manages a company patent portfolio in the Communications technology area. There are 2 pending office actions currently active, and these are handled by 2 distinct examiners. This distribution indicates that each of the 2 pending office actions is being reviewed by a unique official. Both examiners are located within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests that the company's communications-related inventions are focused within a single technical classification at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is SHEN, PEIJIE, who holds 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners each managing 1 of the 2 pending office actions, the active workload is evenly split. The fact that both examiners are in 1 distinct art unit implies a shared technical framework for the evaluation of the 2 pending office actions. Practitioners should focus on the individual requirements of the 2 distinct examiners while maintaining a consistent strategy within the 1 art unit to advance the Healthy Io Ltd. portfolio. This approach helps ensure that the 2 pending office actions are handled with technical consistency.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHEN, PEIJIE | 1 | 79.3% | +17.6% |
| BRYANT, CHRISTIAN THOMAS | 1 | 80.6% | +23.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18711824 | SELF-CALIBRATING DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE THEREOF | BRYANT, CHRISTIAN THOMAS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18982076 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ENHANCING COLOR VISION AND QUANTIFYING COLOR INTERPRETATION | SHEN, PEIJIE | — |
| 18711824 | SELF-CALIBRATING DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE THEREOF | BRYANT, CHRISTIAN THOMAS | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2622 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18982076 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ENHANCING COLOR VISION AND QUANTIFYING COLOR INTERPRETATION | SHEN, PEIJIE | 2622 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 16, 2024 |
| 18711824 | SELF-CALIBRATING DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE THEREOF | BRYANT, CHRISTIAN THOMAS | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 20, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial