Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Hennepin Healthcare System Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Hennepin Healthcare System Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, MELHUS, BENJAMIN S, in 1 distinct art unit. MELHUS, BENJAMIN S is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The company's current prosecution profile is limited to this one pending matter in the medical device field.

The 1 pending office action is being handled by MELHUS, BENJAMIN S, who is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's applications. Practitioners should focus on the individual preferences of this examiner and the technical requirements of the 1 distinct art unit. With no other pending office actions, the company's patent strategy is highly focused on this single case. Successfully navigating this 1 pending office action is essential for the company's intellectual property goals in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MELHUS, BENJAMIN S 1 60.7% +43.5%
EPPERT, LUCY CLARE 1 55.0% +37.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18940942 Method For Predicting Convergence Disorders Caused By Concussion Or Other Neuropathology MELHUS, BENJAMIN S —
18584031 METHODS AND KITS FOR DETECTION OF BLAST BRAIN INJURY, ITS SEVERITY, DISTANCE FROM BLAST EPICENTER, AND CLASSIFICATION RELATIVE TO THE LARGER SPECTRUM OF CONCUSSION EPPERT, LUCY CLARE —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18940942 Method For Predicting Convergence Disorders Caused By Concussion Or Other Neuropathology MELHUS, BENJAMIN S —
18584031 METHODS AND KITS FOR DETECTION OF BLAST BRAIN INJURY, ITS SEVERITY, DISTANCE FROM BLAST EPICENTER, AND CLASSIFICATION RELATIVE TO THE LARGER SPECTRUM OF CONCUSSION EPPERT, LUCY CLARE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18940942 Method For Predicting Convergence Disorders Caused By Concussion Or Other Neuropathology MELHUS, BENJAMIN S 3791 §101§102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2024
18584031 METHODS AND KITS FOR DETECTION OF BLAST BRAIN INJURY, ITS SEVERITY, DISTANCE FROM BLAST EPICENTER, AND CLASSIFICATION RELATIVE TO THE LARGER SPECTRUM OF CONCUSSION EPPERT, LUCY CLARE 3791 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 22, 2024

Managing Hennepin Healthcare System Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Hennepin Healthcare System Inc. have?

Hennepin Healthcare System Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Hennepin Healthcare System Inc. applications?

Benjamin S Melhus has the most, with 1 of Hennepin Healthcare System Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Hennepin Healthcare System Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month