Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Henny Penny Corporation

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Henny Penny Corporation is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that each of the pending office actions is being handled by a different examiner in a different administrative section. Examiner KERR, ELIZABETH M is identified as the busiest examiner, though they are only responsible for 1 pending office action.

This 1 action is part of the total workload. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's filings cover different technical sub-sectors within the broader Chemistry & Materials field. Managing multiple examiners across different units requires a coordination effort to ensure consistency. The company must adapt its prosecution strategy to the specific requirements and examiner tendencies found in each separate administrative environment. Practitioners should monitor the specific habits of KERR, ELIZABETH M while also tracking the other active files. This structure means that the outcome of one case may not necessarily predict the results of the other.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KERR, ELIZABETH M 1 64.8% +27.9%
KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R 1 66.4% +12.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18748713 FRYER INCLUDING AUTOMATIC BASKET SHAKER LIFT AND VISION-BASED CONTROLS OF COOKING CYCLES AND COOKING MEDIUM SERVICING KERR, ELIZABETH M —
18552103 AUTOMATED FOOD FRYING SYSTEMS KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18748713 FRYER INCLUDING AUTOMATIC BASKET SHAKER LIFT AND VISION-BASED CONTROLS OF COOKING CYCLES AND COOKING MEDIUM SERVICING KERR, ELIZABETH M —
18552103 AUTOMATED FOOD FRYING SYSTEMS KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1792 1
1744 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18748713 FRYER INCLUDING AUTOMATIC BASKET SHAKER LIFT AND VISION-BASED CONTROLS OF COOKING CYCLES AND COOKING MEDIUM SERVICING KERR, ELIZABETH M 1792 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2024
18552103 AUTOMATED FOOD FRYING SYSTEMS KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R 1744 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 22, 2023

Managing Henny Penny Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Henny Penny Corporation have?

Henny Penny Corporation has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Henny Penny Corporation applications?

Elizabeth M Kerr has the most, with 1 of Henny Penny Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Henny Penny Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month