1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Heron Therapeutics Inc. currently manages a company patent portfolio with 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner, LANGE, ERIC A. As the busiest examiner for the company, LANGE, ERIC A is responsible for the 1 pending office action that makes up the portfolio's entire active workload.
The portfolio records 0 distinct art units, which may reflect the specific nature or stage of the pending application. With a distinct examiner involved, the company's current patent strategy is focused on a single review process. The pending office action is the only active case currently being prosecuted by the company at the patent office.
Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements and feedback of LANGE, ERIC A to advance the 1 pending office action. The absence of multiple examiners or art units suggests a targeted prosecution profile. Consequently, the resolution of the pending office action is the primary factor in the company's current efforts to secure new patent rights.
The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that the company's immediate patent goals are tied to a single review process. Reviewing the examiner's history can help anticipate potential hurdles and tailor the response. Monitoring the status of the pending office action is vital for timely adjustments to the broader intellectual property strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LANGE, ERIC A | 1 | 77.5% | +12.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18606872 | VIAL ACCESS NEEDLE DEVICE | LANGE, ERIC A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18606872 | VIAL ACCESS NEEDLE DEVICE | LANGE, ERIC A | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18606872 | VIAL ACCESS NEEDLE DEVICE | LANGE, ERIC A | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial