Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Hi-Lex Corporation

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Hi-Lex Corporation is active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 4 pending office actions. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, showing some technical concentration within the company's mechanical filings. The presence of 3 distinct art units for 4 pending office actions suggests that at least two matters fall within the same technical group at the patent office.

The portfolio is reviewed by 4 distinct examiners, which is equal to the total number of 4 pending office actions. RAMSEY, JEREMY C is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This one-to-one ratio means that every pending matter is assigned to a unique individual. With 4 distinct examiners, the company must manage 4 separate examiner relationships across the active cases.

Practitioners must manage 4 separate examiner relationships while navigating the requirements of 3 distinct art units. The busiest examiner, RAMSEY, JEREMY C, handles 1 of the 4 pending office actions, reflecting a distributed workload. This requires a strategy that accounts for the individual preferences of 4 distinct examiners. The data shows that no single examiner has a dominant influence over the 4 pending office actions currently active.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RAMSEY, JEREMY C 1 52.6% +46.6%
SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A 1 65.5% +34.2%
CICCHINO, PATRICK D 1 80.5% +13.5%
LOPEZ, LESLIE ANN 1 65.6% +34.1%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19160048 CARRIER PLATE AND WINDOW REGULATOR RAMSEY, JEREMY C —
18998596 CARRIER PLATE AND WINDOW REGULATOR SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A —
18827911 SEAT CABLE MODULE CICCHINO, PATRICK D —
17792488 CYLINDRICAL EMBEDDED MATERIAL FOR MEDICAL USE LOPEZ, LESLIE ANN —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19160048 CARRIER PLATE AND WINDOW REGULATOR RAMSEY, JEREMY C —
18998596 CARRIER PLATE AND WINDOW REGULATOR SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A —
18827911 SEAT CABLE MODULE CICCHINO, PATRICK D —
17792488 CYLINDRICAL EMBEDDED MATERIAL FOR MEDICAL USE LOPEZ, LESLIE ANN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3634 2
3619 1
3774 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19160048 CARRIER PLATE AND WINDOW REGULATOR RAMSEY, JEREMY C 3634 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 27, 2025
18998596 CARRIER PLATE AND WINDOW REGULATOR SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A 3634 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 27, 2025
18827911 SEAT CABLE MODULE CICCHINO, PATRICK D 3619 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 09, 2024
17792488 CYLINDRICAL EMBEDDED MATERIAL FOR MEDICAL USE LOPEZ, LESLIE ANN 3774 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 13, 2022

Managing Hi-Lex Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Hi-Lex Corporation have?

Hi-Lex Corporation has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Hi-Lex Corporation applications?

Jeremy C Ramsey has the most, with 1 of Hi-Lex Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Hi-Lex Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month