Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hi-Stem Ggmbh

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Hi-Stem Ggmbh operates within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The company's current prosecution profile includes 1 pending office action. This action is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current filings are focused on a specific technical niche. This narrow scope of examination can lead to a more predictable prosecution process as it involves only 1 administrative unit at the USPTO.

The busiest examiner for Hi-Stem Ggmbh is MIANO, JOSEPH PAUL, who is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner is responsible for the 1 pending office action that represents the company's total current prosecution activity. As a result, the outcome of the company's pending patent application is subject to the review of MIANO, JOSEPH PAUL. Practitioners should focus their efforts on meeting the specific criteria set by this examiner. The 1 pending office action indicates a focused and streamlined phase of portfolio growth in the biotechnology sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MIANO, JOSEPH PAUL 1 36.0% +63.3%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16621741 NOVEL METHODS FOR THE GENERATION AND USE OF HUMAN INDUCED NEURAL BORDER STEM CELLS MIANO, JOSEPH PAUL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1631 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
16621741 NOVEL METHODS FOR THE GENERATION AND USE OF HUMAN INDUCED NEURAL BORDER STEM CELLS MIANO, JOSEPH PAUL 1631 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2019

Managing Hi-Stem Ggmbh's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month