Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

HL Robotics Co., Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 1 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

HL Robotics Co., Ltd. has 5 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 5 actions are assigned to 5 distinct examiners, but they are all located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that while different individuals are reviewing the applications, they are all operating under the same technical and administrative leadership within that single unit. This structure suggests a high level of technical focus for the company's current robotics portfolio.

DIAZ, THOMAS C is the busiest examiner for the company, holding the 1 busiest examiner pending action. The concentration of the 5 pending office actions in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's robotics technology is being evaluated against a consistent set of internal standards. This allows the applicant to monitor how the art unit handles similar mechanical claims across the 5 distinct examiners involved. Practitioners can leverage this centralized oversight to identify potential trends in the unit's approach to prior art and claim construction. By addressing the feedback from multiple examiners within the same unit, the company can develop a unified prosecution strategy that accounts for the shared technical expertise of the 1 distinct art unit overseeing all pending matters. This arrangement often leads to more predictable outcomes across the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
§102 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
4
Business / Other
80% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DIAZ, THOMAS C 1 68.5% +19.0%
ADAMS, GREGORY W 1 75.2% +23.8%
STABLEY, MICHAEL R 1 85.8% +12.7%
HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT 1 76.4% +23.7%
HAGEMAN, MARK C 1 73.9% +16.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18829287 DRIVING MODULE AND MOBILE ROBOT INCLUDING THE SAME STABLEY, MICHAEL R —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18204540 VEHICLE PARKING ROBOT AND VEHICLE PARKING METHOD HAGEMAN, MARK C 22d
19009776 VALET PARKING SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR VALET PARKING AND PICKUP OF VEHICLE DIAZ, THOMAS C —
18785294 LIFT DEVICE AND VEHICLE PARKING ROBOT INCLUDING THE SAME HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18204540 VEHICLE PARKING ROBOT AND VEHICLE PARKING METHOD HAGEMAN, MARK C 22d
19009776 VALET PARKING SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR VALET PARKING AND PICKUP OF VEHICLE DIAZ, THOMAS C —
18972565 PARKING ROBOT AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME ADAMS, GREGORY W —
18829287 DRIVING MODULE AND MOBILE ROBOT INCLUDING THE SAME STABLEY, MICHAEL R —
18785294 LIFT DEVICE AND VEHICLE PARKING ROBOT INCLUDING THE SAME HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3652 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19009776 VALET PARKING SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR VALET PARKING AND PICKUP OF VEHICLE DIAZ, THOMAS C — §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 03, 2025
18972565 PARKING ROBOT AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME ADAMS, GREGORY W — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18829287 DRIVING MODULE AND MOBILE ROBOT INCLUDING THE SAME STABLEY, MICHAEL R — §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2024
18785294 LIFT DEVICE AND VEHICLE PARKING ROBOT INCLUDING THE SAME HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 26, 2024
18204540 VEHICLE PARKING ROBOT AND VEHICLE PARKING METHOD HAGEMAN, MARK C 3652 §102§103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Jun 01, 2023

Managing HL Robotics Co., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month