Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Home Chen Technology Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's intellectual property efforts are currently focused on a single technological advancement within this broad category. Working within 1 distinct art unit allows the company to engage with a specific group of examiners who are experts in that particular field of mechanical systems.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is BELLINGER, JASON R, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. This represents a consolidated prosecution effort within a single administrative unit, with no other examiners currently reviewing the company's applications. Since the busiest examiner is only handling 1 pending office action, the portfolio is in a very streamlined state. This concentration simplifies the prosecution strategy but means the outcome of the company's current patent efforts depends entirely on this examiner's review.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BELLINGER, JASON R | 1 | 70.0% | +18.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18604721 | WIRE WHEEL FOR TUBELESS TIRE | BELLINGER, JASON R | 8d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18604721 | WIRE WHEEL FOR TUBELESS TIRE | BELLINGER, JASON R | 3615 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | Mar 14, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial