Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hpf S R L

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Hpf S R L operates a company patent portfolio within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Prosecution activity is currently limited to 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is distributed to 1 distinct examiner. The matter is being processed within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a singular focus in the current examination phase. SIPP, AMY R. is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action.

This 1 busiest examiner pending office action is the only active office action reported for the company. Because the portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution path is highly concentrated. Practitioners can expect a consistent examination experience, as the company is not currently dealing with the varying requirements of multiple distinct examiners. The success of the portfolio's current phase depends on the interaction with this 1 distinct examiner and the specific technical standards of their assigned art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIPP, AMY R. 1 71.1% +25.6%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18280139 SURGICAL TOOL AND CORRESPONDING PRODUCTION METHOD SIPP, AMY R. —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3775 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18280139 SURGICAL TOOL AND CORRESPONDING PRODUCTION METHOD SIPP, AMY R. 3775 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 01, 2023

Managing Hpf S R L's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month