Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hpl Technologies GmbH

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Hpl Technologies GmbH is managing 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. CHRISTY, KATHERINE A is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action.

The distribution of 2 pending office actions across 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's chemical and materials research spans different regulatory classifications. With 2 distinct examiners involved, each handling 1 pending office action, there is no examiner overlap in the current pending workload. This requires the company to adapt to the specific preferences of multiple examiners simultaneously. Managing 2 pending office actions in 2 distinct art units means the company must track two different sets of examination guidelines. CHRISTY, KATHERINE A is responsible for only half of the current pending matters.

Practitioners should note that the 2 distinct art units may have different allowance rates and timelines. Because there are 2 distinct examiners, the company cannot rely on a single relationship to advance its Chemistry & Materials portfolio. Each 1 pending office action requires a unique legal strategy. The 2 pending office actions represent the current active prosecution challenges for Hpl Technologies GmbH.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHRISTY, KATHERINE A 1 75.1% +34.9%
RASHID, MAHBUBUR 1 67.8% +20.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18717519 BASE BODY HAVING A COATING CHRISTY, KATHERINE A 8d overdue
18683721 MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR A WORKPIECE WITH A REFINEMENT LAYER, AND WORKPIECE WITH A REFINEMENT LAYER RASHID, MAHBUBUR —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18717519 BASE BODY HAVING A COATING CHRISTY, KATHERINE A 8d overdue
18683721 MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR A WORKPIECE WITH A REFINEMENT LAYER, AND WORKPIECE WITH A REFINEMENT LAYER RASHID, MAHBUBUR —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1784 1
3616 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18717519 BASE BODY HAVING A COATING CHRISTY, KATHERINE A 1784 §103§112 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Jun 07, 2024
18683721 MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR A WORKPIECE WITH A REFINEMENT LAYER, AND WORKPIECE WITH A REFINEMENT LAYER RASHID, MAHBUBUR 3616 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2024

Managing Hpl Technologies GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month