Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Hs-Tumbler GmbH

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Hs-Tumbler GmbH has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions involve 3 distinct examiners and are located in 2 distinct art units. ISSA, JUEVARA SAOOD is the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending action. The distribution of 3 examiners across 2 art units indicates some technical overlap in the company's active filings.

Having 3 distinct examiners for 3 pending actions means that each matter is being reviewed by a different individual. However, the concentration in only 2 distinct art units suggests that the company is interacting with a limited number of examining groups. This allows practitioners to focus on the specific policies and trends of those 2 art units while managing 3 different examiner personalities within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field.

The presence of 3 pending office actions across 2 art units indicates a robust but technically focused filing strategy. The 1 to 1 ratio of actions to examiners prevents any single person's bias from dominating the portfolio. Instead, the company must manage 3 independent prosecution tracks, each potentially offering different challenges and opportunities within the same 2 technical environments.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
0
Medium (0%)
2
Easy (67%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ISSA, JUEVARA SAOOD 1 100.0% +0.0%
KIM, BOBBY YEONJIN 1 76.5% +20.7%
PERRIN, JOSEPH L 1 77.2% +21.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18872655 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR COMMINUTING AND MIXING SOLIDS ISSA, JUEVARA SAOOD —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18840965 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR GRINDING KIM, BOBBY YEONJIN —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18840965 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR GRINDING KIM, BOBBY YEONJIN —
18840971 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TREATING TEXTILES OR LEATHER PERRIN, JOSEPH L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3725 1
1711 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18872655 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR COMMINUTING AND MIXING SOLIDS ISSA, JUEVARA SAOOD — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18840965 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR GRINDING KIM, BOBBY YEONJIN 3725 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18840971 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TREATING TEXTILES OR LEATHER PERRIN, JOSEPH L 1711 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 23, 2024

Managing Hs-Tumbler GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Hs-Tumbler GmbH have?

Hs-Tumbler GmbH has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Hs-Tumbler GmbH applications?

Juevara Saood Issa has the most, with 1 of Hs-Tumbler GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Hs-Tumbler GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month