Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Huizhou Sanchuang Technology Co. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ANDERSON, AMARA, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The prosecution is conducted within 1 distinct art unit, which defines the technical scope of the company's current patenting activity.
The data indicates a focused prosecution profile with 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner. This concentration means that the company's success in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field is currently tied to the decisions of ANDERSON, AMARA. The presence of 1 distinct art unit further suggests that the technical subject matter is specialized and does not span multiple examination divisions.
With 1 pending office action, the company's current workload at the patent office is limited. The 1 distinct examiner, ANDERSON, AMARA, handles the entirety of this workload. Because the prosecution is limited to 1 distinct art unit, the company can focus its resources on meeting the specific examination standards of that single technical area within Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDERSON, AMARA | 1 | 86.8% | +15.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18493622 | DOUBLE-ROW CONNECTOR SUPPORTING PLASTIC COATING | ANDERSON, AMARA | 56d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18493622 | DOUBLE-ROW CONNECTOR SUPPORTING PLASTIC COATING | ANDERSON, AMARA | 56d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2831 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18493622 | DOUBLE-ROW CONNECTOR SUPPORTING PLASTIC COATING | ANDERSON, AMARA | 2831 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 56d | Pending | Oct 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial