Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Human Anti-Aging Standards Research Institute Co. Ltd. maintains a company patent portfolio that currently contains 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is handled by 1 distinct examiner. The data indicates that there are 0 distinct art units associated with these filings, which suggests the portfolio is concentrated within a specific technical niche or is in an early stage of classification. This arrangement indicates a very focused prosecution path for the institute.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the total number of pending office actions is 1, OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC is the official currently reviewing the company's active matters. The 1 distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units mean that the prosecution is currently centralized. Practitioners should track the progress of the 1 pending office action to understand the examiner's specific approach to the company's technology. The absence of multiple art units simplifies the coordination required for this portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC | 1 | 50.0% | +57.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18875398 | METHOD FOR PREDICTING DELIRIUM OCCURRENCE, AND DEVICE FOR PREDICTING DELIRIUM OCCURRENCE USING SAME | OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18875398 | METHOD FOR PREDICTING DELIRIUM OCCURRENCE, AND DEVICE FOR PREDICTING DELIRIUM OCCURRENCE USING SAME | OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18875398 | METHOD FOR PREDICTING DELIRIUM OCCURRENCE, AND DEVICE FOR PREDICTING DELIRIUM OCCURRENCE USING SAME | OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC | — | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial