Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Human Centred Innovations Pty Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Human Centred Innovations Pty Ltd. operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action, which is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. This prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused examination process for the company's mechanical or e-commerce innovations. Such a concentrated profile indicates that the company is currently prioritizing a specific technological path within its broader industry.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is OSTROW, ALAN LINDSAY, who is managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner is the sole point of contact for the company's current patent applications. The alignment of the portfolio within a single art unit and under a single examiner indicates that the current prosecution strategy is concentrated on a specific technological niche. This allows the applicant to focus all efforts on the requirements of 1 distinct examiner, potentially streamlining the path to allowance for the pending application.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
OSTROW, ALAN LINDSAY 1 73.1% +24.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18028983 VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL SOCIAL ROBOT WITH HUMANOID FEATURES OSTROW, ALAN LINDSAY —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18028983 VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL SOCIAL ROBOT WITH HUMANOID FEATURES OSTROW, ALAN LINDSAY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3657 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18028983 VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL SOCIAL ROBOT WITH HUMANOID FEATURES OSTROW, ALAN LINDSAY 3657 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2023

Managing Human Centred Innovations Pty Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month