Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Humanetics Corporation is active in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area with 1 pending office action. The prosecution is managed by 1 distinct examiner, which suggests a highly focused set of filings. The data indicates that the portfolio is currently interacting with 1 distinct art unit, showing that the technical scope of the active applications is limited to a specific pharmaceutical or biological category. This concentration suggests a highly specific set of filings within this particular technological domain.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is WORSHAM, JESSICA N, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. With 1 busiest examiner pending action, this individual is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's matters. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of this examiner, as they represent the sole active authority for the portfolio. This centralized prosecution structure within a single art unit means that the company's current patent success depends on a single line of communication with the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WORSHAM, JESSICA N | 1 | 56.3% | +56.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17890809 | PROTECTING TISSUE AND MITIGATING INJURY FROM RADIATION-INDUCED IONIZING EVENTS | WORSHAM, JESSICA N | 83d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17890809 | PROTECTING TISSUE AND MITIGATING INJURY FROM RADIATION-INDUCED IONIZING EVENTS | WORSHAM, JESSICA N | 83d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17890809 | PROTECTING TISSUE AND MITIGATING INJURY FROM RADIATION-INDUCED IONIZING EVENTS | WORSHAM, JESSICA N | 1615 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 83d | Pending | Aug 18, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial