Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Humaniras University is currently engaged in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The company has 1 pending office action, suggesting a very targeted approach to its current patent prosecution efforts. This level of activity indicates that the company is focusing its resources on a specific set of biological or pharmaceutical innovations at this stage of its development.
The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the company's current filings are being reviewed within a single specialized area of the patent office, which can lead to a more predictable examination experience. IVICH, FERNANDO NMN is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, representing the primary technical reviewer for the company's applications.
IVICH, FERNANDO NMN is responsible for 1 pending office action. This single action represents the total pending workload for the company, meaning the prosecution strategy is currently focused on a single point of contact. This simplifies the monitoring of the company's intellectual property development in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector and allows for a direct response to the examiner's findings.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| IVICH, FERNANDO NMN | 1 | 48.7% | +69.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17634164 | METHOD OF IDENTIFYING PEPTIDE ANTIGENS AND USES THEREOF | IVICH, FERNANDO NMN | 65d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17634164 | METHOD OF IDENTIFYING PEPTIDE ANTIGENS AND USES THEREOF | IVICH, FERNANDO NMN | 65d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1678 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17634164 | METHOD OF IDENTIFYING PEPTIDE ANTIGENS AND USES THEREOF | IVICH, FERNANDO NMN | 1678 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 65d | Pending | Feb 09, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial