Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Hunamis LLC has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, HARANDI, SIAMAK, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The prosecution is contained within 1 distinct art unit, matching the total count of active cases.
The 1 pending office action represents the full extent of the company's current USPTO activity. The focus is entirely on a single examiner within the Communications technology area. This concentration allows for a highly specific prosecution strategy but relies entirely on the interpretation of 1 distinct examiner. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of HARANDI, SIAMAK.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit further confirms that the company's current legal efforts are focused on a narrow technical niche. This allows the company to develop a deep understanding of the specific requirements of the assigned examiner. However, it also means that the outcome of the 1 pending office action will define the company's current success in the Communications sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN | 1 | 79.2% | +27.8% |
| HARANDI, SIAMAK | 1 | 90.6% | +7.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18656663 | PREDICTIVE DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION SYSTEM | HARANDI, SIAMAK | 65d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18982178 | MULTISPECTRAL CAMOUFLAGE TESTING AND DEFEAT CAPABILITY | MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18982178 | MULTISPECTRAL CAMOUFLAGE TESTING AND DEFEAT CAPABILITY | MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2662 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18982178 | MULTISPECTRAL CAMOUFLAGE TESTING AND DEFEAT CAPABILITY | MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 16, 2024 |
| 18656663 | PREDICTIVE DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION SYSTEM | HARANDI, SIAMAK | 2662 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 65d | Pending | May 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial