Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Hunt Innovative Technologies L L C manages 4 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 4 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This indicates that multiple examiners are working within the same art units for this portfolio, which may lead to shared technical perspectives during examination.
The busiest examiner, RUNYAN, SILVANA C, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Each of the 4 distinct examiners handles exactly 1 pending action for the company. Because there are only 2 distinct art units for 4 actions, the company's prosecution is more concentrated at the art unit level than at the examiner level.
Practitioners should coordinate their responses to the 4 pending office actions to ensure consistency across the 2 distinct art units. While each examiner is different, the shared art units suggest that the applications involve closely related technologies. Navigating the 4 distinct examiners requires a strategy that addresses individual preferences while maintaining a unified technical narrative within each art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| §112 only | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUNYAN, SILVANA C | 1 | 82.5% | +17.0% |
| CULLER, JILL E | 1 | 57.2% | +13.9% |
| BATES, ZAKIYA W | 1 | 88.8% | -2.0% |
| SUE-AKO, ANDREW B. | 1 | 71.5% | +27.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19095309 | Method for Borehole Completion | BATES, ZAKIYA W | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19205646 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO FRACTURE AND SEAL SUBTERRANEAN FORMATIONS | RUNYAN, SILVANA C | 45d overdue |
| 19174598 | METHOD TO MEASURE FRACTURE WIDTH | CULLER, JILL E | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19205646 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO FRACTURE AND SEAL SUBTERRANEAN FORMATIONS | RUNYAN, SILVANA C | 45d overdue |
| 18923257 | Method for Generating Self-Propped Hydraulic Fractures | SUE-AKO, ANDREW B. | 6d |
| 19174598 | METHOD TO MEASURE FRACTURE WIDTH | CULLER, JILL E | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3674 | 3 |
| 2853 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19205646 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO FRACTURE AND SEAL SUBTERRANEAN FORMATIONS | RUNYAN, SILVANA C | 3674 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 45d overdue | Pending | May 12, 2025 |
| 19174598 | METHOD TO MEASURE FRACTURE WIDTH | CULLER, JILL E | 2853 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 09, 2025 |
| 19095309 | Method for Borehole Completion | BATES, ZAKIYA W | 3674 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 31, 2025 |
| 18923257 | Method for Generating Self-Propped Hydraulic Fractures | SUE-AKO, ANDREW B. | 3674 | §103Other | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | Oct 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialHunt Innovative Technologies L L C has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 4 examiners.
Silvana C Runyan has the most, with 1 of Hunt Innovative Technologies L L C's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
